All three CPSC members’ statements on yesterday’s decision to deny the exemption of crystal and glass beads underline the inflexibility of this law, which has stripped the CPSC of its authority to use risk-based analysis in their determinations. Their statements included the following excerpts:

From Chairwoman Inez Tenenbaum:

“… In making a determination, I was mindful that the statute does not use the term “harmful” amount or another term which would allow staff to utilize a risk based approach. …Thus while Commission staff recognized that most crystal and glass beads do not appear to pose a serious health risk to children, because ingested crystal beads that leach lead will result in some lead absorption, the request for an exclusion must be denied.” “…the statutory language…does not allow for the consideration of risk.”

From Commissioner Thomas Moore:

“… To allow this exception to our enforcement activities is simply not supportable under the strict standards of the CPSIA.”

From Commissioner Nancy Nord:

“… Because the statute does not give us the ability to be flexible, I cannot vote to grant an exclusion in this case. However, not granting an exclusion will result in the removal of safe products from the marketplace, causing significant economic injury. Therefore I believe there is only one equitable solution available to us and that is to grant a stay of enforcement for a limited time while Congress considers the unintended consequences of the CPSIA, e.g. products banned that have no real safety issues; economic hardship that is unnecessary to achieve consumer safety; and in this case, 10-year old girls being told by the Federal Government that they cannot have rhinestones on their jeans.”

Their full statements are available here:

Commissioners’ Statements on the Request from the Fashion Jewelry Trade Association to Exclude Crystal and Glass Beads in Children’s Products from the Lead Content Limits Under Section 101(b)(1) of the CPSIA:
Chairman Tenenbaum <http://www.cpsc.gov/pr/tenenbaum071709.pdf>
Commissioner Moore <http://www.cpsc.gov/pr/moore071709.pdf>
Commissioner Nord <http://www.cpsc.gov/pr/nord071709.pdf>

Past commission statements had already made the point that their hands were tied by the CPSIA, so what’s different now? Congress can no longer blame Republican Nancy Nord for CPSIA problems. Obama appointee, Inez Tenenbaum is the new Chairwoman. Ms. Tenenbaum’s statement agrees that there is no wiggle room in the CPSIA to “utilize a risk based approach”.  Congress just lost their scapegoat.

As Chairman of the House committee with jurisdiction over the CPSIA, it’s way past time for Henry Waxman to step up and fix this legislative disaster. Holding hearings with testimony from affected parties would be a good place to start.

On July 7th, Henry Waxman publicly agreed to hold hearings on the CPSIA during an appearance on The Diane Rehm Show, but he has since cancelled those hearings yet again. Apparently, he can make time to promote his own book, but not to save and/or restore thousands of US jobs with the stroke of a pen, or insure the integrity of legislation he supports.

Please contact your representatives and urge them to push for CPSIA hearings and reform, especially if they are on the House Energy and Commerce Committee:

Henry Waxman (chair) D-CA (30th Dist)
John Dingell (chair emeritus) D-MI (15th Dist)
Edward Markey D-MA (7th Dist)
Rick Boucher D-VA (9th Dist)
Frank Pallone, Jr D-NJ (6th Dist)
Bart Gordon D-TN (6th Dist)
Bobby Rush D-IL (1st Dist)
Anna Eshoo D-CA (14th Dist)
Bart Stupak D-MI (1st Dist)
Eliot Engel D-NY (17th Dist)
Gene Green D-TX (29th Dist)
Diana DeGette D-CO (1st Dist)
Lois Capps D-CA (23rd Dist)
Michael Doyle D-PA (14th Dist)
Jane Harman D-CA (36th Dist)
Janice Schakowsky D-IL (9th Dist)
Charles Gonzalez D-TX (20th Dist)
Jay Inslee D-WA (1st Dist)
Tammy Baldwin D-WI (2nd Dist)
Mike Ross D-AR (4th Dist)
Anthony Weiner D-NY (9th Dist)
Jim Matheson D-UT (2nd Dist)
GK Butterfield D-NC (1st Dist)
Charlie Melancon D-LA (3rd Dist)
John Barrow D-GA (12th Dist)
Baron Hill D-IN (9th Dist)
Doris Matsui D-CA (5th Dist)
Donna Christensen D-VI
Kathy Castor D-FL (11th Dist)
John Sarbanes D-MD (3rd Dist)
Christopher Murphy D-CT (5th Dist)
Zack Space D-OH (18th Dist)
Jerry McNerney D-CA (11th Dist)
Betty Sutton D-OH (13th Dist)
Bruce Braley D-IA (1st Dist)
Peter Welch D-VT
Joe Barton (ranking member) R-TX (6th Dist)
Ralph Hall R-TX (4th Dist)
Fred Upton R-MI (6th Dist)
Cliff Stearns R-FL (6th Dist)
Nathan Deal R-GA (9th Dist)
Ed Whitfield R-KY (1st Dist)
John Shimkus R-IL (19th Dist)
John Shadegg R-AZ (3rd Dist)
Roy Blunt R-MO (7th Dist)
Steve Buyer R-IN (4th Dist)
George Radanovich R-CA (19th Dist)
Joseph Pitts R-PA (16th Dist)
Mary Bono Mack R-CA (45th Dist)
Greg Walden R-OR (2nd Dist)
Lee Terry R-NE (2nd Dist)
Mike Rogers R-MI (8th Dist)
Sue WIlkins Myrick R-NC (9th Dist)
John Sullivan R-OK (1st Dist)
Tim Murphy R-PA (18th Dist)
Michael Burgess R-TX (26th Dist)
Marsha Blackburn R-TN (7th Dist)
Phil Gingrey R-GA (11th Dist)
Steve Scalise R-LA (1st Dist)

Keep writing, emailing and calling.  Many livelihoods depend on it!

The Show’s stated topic:

Representative Henry Waxman, Congressman Henry Waxman, 30th District, California chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee. He offers his perspective on health care and climate change legislation and explains how Congress really works.

Please call in to the show (1-800-433-8850) to question Mr. Waxman directly.  You can also send your question/comment via email (drshow@wamu.org)

Here is the email I sent this evening (I attempted to frame it within the context of the stated show topic):

Dear Ms. Rehm,
I am a huge fan of your show and listen often.  Thank you for the excellent work you do.

As a Liberal/Progressive mom, I imagine Mr. Waxman and I support many of the same causes.  But how can we trust Congress to reshape health care and energy when we have seen “how Congress really works” through their enactment of lemons like the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008?

As a result of that seriously flawed legislation:
- Childrens books printed before 1985 are banned
- Used kids clothing must be sent to the landfill instead of being donated or consigned
- Domestic crafters selling handmade products (like myself) have been shut down
- Big toy companies actually guilty of selling tainted toys have been rewarded by the bankruptcy of their smaller competition, who simply don’t have the economies of scale to support the cost of the redundant testing, certification and permanent labeling specifically mandated by the sweeping new regulations

If these were “unintended consequences” why hasn’t Congress fixed them with a common-sense amendment?  My children are no safer as a result of this law, and their mom is out of business.  With a track record like this, I shudder to think of what my kid’s health care will look like after Congress gets a hold of it.

Sincerely,
Jennifer DeGrace

Email Colleen (see her website above for contact info, or find her at Twitter: @naturaltoybox) a photo of a product you make, sell or buy (yes, you can participate as a consumer) that cannot survive the CPSIA in its current form and will therefore soon be extinct.  Include a paragraph or two (or a link to it) about the impact of the CPSIA on you, your household or your business.  Every day, Colleen will feature a soon-to-be-extinct product via Twitter, and the group of products and stories will be compiled as a powerfully moving message to lawmakers and the still largely unaware public.

Please take a few minutes to email Colleen your story and product.  I sent her a link to this page.

Here is a photo of one of my formerly best-selling hair bows.  Imagine the testing cost for all the various ribbon types in this one bow design.  Multiply that by hundreds of designs, most available in three to five different sizes, and each of those available attached to a wide variety of clips, barrettes and pony elastics.  The possible iterations are endless.  Customization, luxurious detail, and a continually growing product offering (based on seasonal fashion trends) were all hallmarks of my business, and are all reasons it is impossible for me to comply with CPSIA testing, certification and labeling regulations.

This excerpt from my February 2009 letter to President Obama describes my situation:

I have had to close my hair accessory business because testing is simply not an attainable option for a small producer of custom products. Congress has made it painfully clear how expendable and insignificant they consider my plight through their profound lack of response to my repeated requests for CPSIA reform. But I believe my situation is representative of thousands, and worth a closer look.

If family integrity is revered at all, the entrepreneurial efforts of mothers providing their families with needed income while home caring for their children should be valued and encouraged, not ignored, disparaged, or regulated out of existence. And it goes well beyond moms like me, working from home. My local consignment shop, a 26 year old family business, has stopped selling children’s items – previously the largest portion of their sales. I’m afraid to sell my own kids’ outgrown clothing, which typically funds their next year’s wardrobe. Our school district and local library are biting their nails, waiting, hoping for reasonable reform before the stay of enforcement expires. Even many domestic manufacturers far larger than myself can’t afford to comply with testing requirements and are on the brink of collapse. Personally, I have lost my disposable income, and with it, my ability to stimulate the local economy. Multiply these experiences by tens of thousands across the country.

And while businesses hobble along, crippled by the CPSIA, close up completely, or operate unknowingly in violation (risking significant liability) Congress deflects responsibility and plays politics with the CPSC. The complete unwillingness of Democratic lawmakers to even concede there is more to the story than big business vs. children’s safety is excruciatingly disheartening to me as a liberal, forsaken by my own party.

The complete letter is here.  A week or two ago (about 4 months after sending this letter to the President) I received a card from the White House in response.  It thanked me for communicating with the President, but made clear that no one had read my letter yet, as they are very busy.

Thanks Colleen, for your work to amend the CPSIA.  It will obviously require a continued and tireless effort on all our parts.

Nancy Nord and the CPSC responded to Rep. Dingell’s questions about the CPSIA today. You should take a look, they had a lot to say. There were so many recommendations made all the way through the letter that would provide badly needed relief, that I have to admit I was disappointed that it ended with just three bullet points promoted:

“We conclude that the following three changes would resolve many of the major difficulties identified above:

• Limit the applicability of new requirements to products manufactured after the effective date, except in circumstances where the Commission decides that exposure to a product presents a health and safety risk to children.
• Lower the age limit used in the definition of children’s products to better reflect exposure and give the CPSC discretion to set a higher age for certain materials or classes of products that pose a risk to older children or to younger ones in the same household.
• Allow the CPSC to address certification, tracking labels and other issues on a product class or other logical basis, using risk-assessment methodologies to establish need, priorities and a phase-in schedule.”

The 21-page response did also note (my interpretation):

• They have been underfunded and understaffed, crippling implementation and other duties
• The spectrum of industries affected is enormously broad
• Risk assessment should be used to establish priorities
• Implementation deadlines should be extended
• The cost to businesses, especially small and micro-businesses is significant
• Toxic substance limits should be based on “the possibility of exposure in relation to age” rather than total content
• The law should not be retroactive
• Age limits should be lowered and established by product class
• The CPSC should have more discretion in implementation, to grant exclusions and set age limits

They discussed books at length, including my favorite passage:

“At this time the Commission staff has not had the time or resources to prove that books made more than twenty years ago do not exceed the lead limits as staff has needed to focus its resources on its investigations of deaths and injuries to children and other emerging risks and health hazards.” Since those deaths and injuries are not occurring in libraries filled with old books, this is obviously a huge waste of time. OK, I added that last part, but seriously.

I also enjoyed the full page of legal citations refuting the claims of “Those who argue that common sense exclusions are permitted by the CPSIA”.

This is generally good, but I guess I’m left unsatisfied because while the challenges for small and micro-businesses (crafters are mentioned specifically on memo page 9) are recognized and articulated, the proposed solutions for us are sketchy at best:

“Recognizing that the Commission always has the ability to take action to address unsafe products in the marketplace, Congress could take many different approaches to mitigate the effects on small businesses. Congress could apply the new lead and phthalates limits prospectively to mitigate the impact on inventory existing prior to enactment. It could allow for a more flexible exception process based on balancing of risks against the burdens of the costs of testing and certification but that could overburden staff. Another option would be to allow the Commission the flexibility to decide what children’s products require testing and certification.”

Which basically sounds like the viability of our businesses is tied up in the third bullet of their conclusion, and may ultimately be left up to the discretion of the overburdened, understaffed CPSC, should Congress grant them that discretion. Not exactly a silver bullet.

Note: on page 9 of the memo, I’m thinking that’s supposed to be 763, not 963. ]]> http://www.waytobow.com/2009/03/the-cpsc-recommends/feed/ 0 http://www.waytobow.com/2009/03/cpsia-urgent-call-to-action/ http://www.waytobow.com/2009/03/cpsia-urgent-call-to-action/#comments Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:54:00 +0000 admin http://www.waytobow.com/archives/5 I’m shamefully late getting this posted, as time is now short, but here’s hoping late is better than not at all:

If you haven’t read Congressman Dingell’s letter to the CPSC, you must. This is sharply different from anything else I’ve heard out of Democrats in Congress, in that he admits that there are problems with the CPSIA that merit immediate attention, and is apparently open to resolving them legislatively. His letter poses several intelligent questions to the CPSC about the problems and possible solutions, and requests an urgent response by this Friday, 3/13.

Get busy: If you are negatively impacted by the CPSIA, respond to his questions directly so he will know first-hand how the CPSIA is working in the real world.

Rick Woldenberg posted an email address on his excellent blog, CPSIA – Comments & Observations where you can send your response to Rep. Dingell’s letter and it will be delivered to both the CPSC and Rep. Dingell’s office along with all the other responses sent in. This is a great way to make sure your letter is noticed and has impact. Start writing!

When you are done with that, you might stop by Reform CPSIA, where they are collecting the stories of those impacted by the CPSIA in order to showcase the literal impact this law is having. I think it’s a great step toward making our plight more tangible.

I know it’s a lot of work, but if you only do one thing, at least write to Rep. Dingell and let him know how critically his support for amending this legislation is needed. He’s the first to open the door, let’s be sure to get our foot in. ]]> http://www.waytobow.com/2009/03/cpsia-urgent-call-to-action/feed/ 0 http://www.waytobow.com/2009/02/cpsia-my-letter-to-the-president/ http://www.waytobow.com/2009/02/cpsia-my-letter-to-the-president/#comments Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:05:00 +0000 admin http://www.waytobow.com/archives/35 One step forward, two steps back. It’s downright disheartening, and you can bet that’s the objective. I’m thoroughly disgusted with Congress’s lack of responsibility and common sense. Not to mention common courtesy: for the dozens of emails, letters and phone calls I have made, I’ve yet to receive one single response. Today, I’m writing again to President Obama:

Dear Mr. President:

Like so many others, I worked hard to get you elected, and I’m thrilled that our collective efforts were fruitful. Solutions to real problems require a measured, thoughtful and reasoned assessment of myriad issues too often top-lined for the sake of media sound bites or political sparring. Your ability to both weigh and articulate complexities is one of the reasons I voted for you.

So I am asking you now to apply that skill to the very real problems with the CPSIA. This is not a business vs. children issue, as it has been portrayed. As a mother, a liberal, an environmentalist and small business owner, I welcome the new limits on harmful materials in children’s products, just as ardently as I oppose the irresponsible and destructive aspects of this law, which do not improve safety. These include:

RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF NEW STANDARDS has created immoral and unnecessary waste, not to mention lost profits and productivity, confusion and closed businesses. Wasted unsalable new inventory and used goods. Businesses, non-profits and individuals scramble to follow the law and the CPSC’s specific directions to sequester books published before 1985, and dispose of, rather than donate or sell used clothing bearing buttons, snaps or zippers, as well as untested toys and other products. This is particularly unconscionable considering that there are no reported injuries attributed to these products. Products found to cause injury have already been recalled, and are therefore already unlawful to sell, making this completely unnecessary and shamefully wasteful.

END PRODUCT TESTING has forced small producers out of the market, ironically leaving the spoils to the same large companies – manufacturing overseas – who are guilty of the very offenses that spurred Congress to create the CPSIA in the first place. While it may seem reasonable to test each component of a completed made-in-China “Dora” doll before selling millions of them, that logic does not hold up when applied to testing each component of a completed domestic handmade dress before selling three of them. Expensive third-party testing is simply not practicable for small producers, and as their products have not been shown to be the offenders, imposing regulations that force them out of the market is unfair, un-American and considering the current economy, unwise. What does make sense, affords greater safety and efficiency, is requiring manufacturers to use CPSIA compliant materials and manufacturing processes.

I have had to close my hair accessory business because testing is simply not an attainable option for a small producer of custom products. Congress has made it painfully clear how expendable and insignificant they consider my plight through their profound lack of response to my repeated requests for CPSIA reform. But I believe my situation is representative of thousands, and worth a closer look.

If family integrity is revered at all, the entrepreneurial efforts of mothers providing their families with needed income while home caring for their children should be valued and encouraged, not ignored, disparaged, or regulated out of existence. And it goes well beyond moms like me, working from home. My local consignment shop, a 26 year old family business, has stopped selling children’s items – previously the largest portion of their sales. I’m afraid to sell my own kids’ outgrown clothing, which typically funds their next year’s wardrobe. Our school district and local library are biting their nails, waiting, hoping for reasonable reform before the stay of enforcement expires. Even many domestic manufacturers far larger than myself can’t afford to comply with testing requirements and are on the brink of collapse. Personally, I have lost my disposable income, and with it, my ability to stimulate the local economy. Multiply these experiences by tens of thousands across the country.

And while businesses hobble along, crippled by the CPSIA, close up completely, or operate unknowingly in violation (risking significant liability) Congress deflects responsibility and plays politics with the CPSC. The complete unwillingness of Democratic lawmakers to even concede there is more to the story than big business vs. children’s safety is excruciatingly disheartening to me as a liberal, forsaken by my own party.

I beg you to intervene. Please make CPSIA reform an urgent priority, for the sake of small business, consumer safety, and our children. Far more of them will be compromised by their parents’ loss of income than could ever be compromised by reading old books or wearing jeans with zippers.

Sincerely,

Jen DeGrace
Jen Lynn Designs

Please continue to make your voice heard. Only sustained and growing public outcry can possibly affect change.

I visited my local consignment shop today, Second Time Around, and was sad to hear that not only are they no longer accepting or selling children’s items (the store was completely cleared of them!) but that the change may mean the end of their 26 yr old family business. She told me she’s had clients in her store literally cry upon hearing the news, not knowing how they are going to clothe their kids. I guess they’ll go to Walmart or Target? Hmmm… is it just me, or is it starting to seem like the big box stores have more to gain from this legislation than consumers?

I’m not giving up. Even if it is too late for me, it’s not too late for sanity. I’ll be sending out a new round of letters today and tomorrow to make sure my pen-pals know they’re responsible for shutting down my business. This batch includes:

• My Congressional Reps
• Waxman and his posse: Rush, Rockefeller and Pryor
• Nancy Nord
• Senator DeMint to ask that he keep pushing his reform bill (I still can’t believe I share any political common ground with Jim DeMint – hey you just never know)
• All 18 members of the board at Consumers Union to let them know I canceled my subscription to Consumer Reports because of their continued support of the obviously flawed CPSIA (Yeah, I know, they’ll be crushed. Interesting to note, however, that among the board members is none other than Craig Newmark, founder of Craigslist. He seems like a good guy, and surely he can appreciate the value of the used goods market? Will Craigslist grow as mamas with loads of outgrown banned hazardous childrens clothing fear selling ‘out in the open’ on eBay?)

It still comes down to the fact that the CPSC’s authority is limited, and the law is the law. Keep up the pressure on Congress to change the law so that the CPSC and small businesses trying to comply aren’t put in the position of finding ways around it. The best news today is that Senator Jim DeMint from South Carolina announced his intention to do just that. Email Senator DeMint and your own reps in the House and Senate again today to make sure they don’t back down in the face of pressure from powerful CPSIA backers with their armies of lawyers and lobbyists.

Rep. Jim DeMint announces intent to reform CPSIA
CPSC’s Press Release
Associated Press Coverage
Fashion-Incubator on the Stay ]]> http://www.waytobow.com/2009/01/cpsia-change-is-coming/feed/ 0 http://www.waytobow.com/2009/01/cpsia-get-it-right-the-second-time/ http://www.waytobow.com/2009/01/cpsia-get-it-right-the-second-time/#comments Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:59:00 +0000 admin http://www.waytobow.com/archives/58 Congress: stand up and take ownership. Stop passing the “CPSIA buck” back and forth with the CPSC, and deal with it head-on.

Citizens: contact your representatives and let them know that their mistakes are only dishonorable if they won’t admit them, and the law is only flawed if it they don’t fix it. The buck stops at Chairman Waxman’s desk, as he chairs the Energy and Commerce Committee. Be sure to include him in your correspondence to your representatives, as well as the bill’s sponsor and Subcommittee Chair, Bobby Rush and Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Joe Barton (see his 1/21/09 letter to Chairman Waxman which notes constituents’ concerns.)

For those just catching up with CPSIA legislation and wondering what all the fuss is about, here is a brief introduction:

HR4040, The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA).
There has been a lot of misinformation about this law due to its great scope and complexity, but it does mandate changes that may well affect most of us.

The law is a response to the recalls of toys made in China with lead-tainted paint. It was widely appreciated and easily passed, as we are all eager to protect our kids. However, lawmakers are now becoming aware of some unintended consequences of the 63-page law. Though it was written to address the above problem, it applies so broadly, that several issues have come to light. Just two of these issues include:

• The law is retroactive. It is illegal for resellers, thrift and consignment shops to sell any item intended for use by a child 12 or under if it has more than 600 ppm of lead as of 2/10/09 (and 300 ppm starting in August 2009) or otherwise violates new standards. The CPSC clarified this issue on 1/8/09 by stating that used items do not need to be tested to prove they meet requirements, but they do need to meet the requirements. If you are confused, you are not alone. This impacts libraries (children’s books are included), charities depending on thrift sales and donations (clothes and gear are included), and any retailer selling children’s items stocked before 2/10/09.

• The law mandates testing and certification to prove that new finished products meet regulations. While this sounds perfectly reasonable, it means that even if an artisan supplies testing reports showing that all the materials they use to make their products meet regulations, they still must have each unique combination of these materials tested and certified, once they are assembled into a new finished product. Legally, if you assemble a product, you are the manufacturer, and responsible for what can be very expensive testing and certification. This greatly impacts small-scale manufacturers and handcrafters.

“When it comes to resellers, there is not a requirement for them to test. There is a lot of misinformation being floated out by the media, by the mommy blogs, by others blogging on legislation that they’re just not understanding, and it needs to be clear, and it needs to be concise, in terms of their requirements under the law.”

So Ms. Vallese clarified it for resellers:

“What second-hand shops need to do and understand in terms of their responsibility is, they do need to meet the law, the law does apply to them. How they meet that law, is not defined in the legislation.”

“There is a lead level limit of 600 ppm total lead that needs to be met. How a shop owner comes to their level of confidence is not defined in the legislation. They simply need to make a business decision, at a level of confidence, that the products they are selling meets the law.”

How did Ms. Vallese suggest they do this?

“They can look at it, and make an informed decision on whether or not that product meets the law, they could call the manufacturer of that product and ask them whether or not there was any lead used in the manufacturing of that product. Or they could test.”

“What consignment shop and thrift store owners should do, is use their best judgment on how they reach that level of confidence that they’re meeting the law.”

To further make her point, Ms. Vallese noted that the CPSC only has about 100 field investigators, and: “The agency will be putting those resources to use in places that we can address the greatest risk and those products that will cause the most harm.”

My take? The CPSC is encouraging resellers to take their chances with liability by “using their best judgment” because they are unlikely to be prosecuted. Hmmm… that sounds exactly like what we’ve been reporting. Thank you Ms. Vallese, for clarifying that the CPSIA really is as corrupt as we feared. My best judgment tells me not to accept a wink and a nod as a binding legal agreement from the CPSC or anyone else. Maybe it works in politics, but do they seriously expect businesses and non-profits to risk violations and penalties when livelihoods are at stake? ]]> http://www.waytobow.com/2009/01/cpsia-julie-vallese-interview-clears-it-up/feed/ 0 http://www.waytobow.com/2009/01/cpsia-information-articles-and-resources/ http://www.waytobow.com/2009/01/cpsia-information-articles-and-resources/#comments Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:02:00 +0000 admin http://www.waytobow.com/archives/56 Because good information regarding the CPSIA legislation HR4040 has been difficult to find, and critical to anyone making or buying handmade products for kids, I have listed below some recent news articles and information sources. When I tell people myself what the law entails, they tend to look at me sympathetically, like I’m some kind of alarmist nut. While it is hard to believe, sadly, it’s also true, and denial isn’t making it go away. Keep pressuring congress and the Consumer Product Safety Commission to fix the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, and please do it now as time is running out for many small businesses.

CPSIA News and Opinions

1/30/09 Today’s Developments

1/29/09 NAM asks CPSIA rules delay, The Journal of Commerce Online

1/29/09 No Word on Book Exemption as CPSIA Deadline Near, Publishers Weekly

1/28/09 How ‘Child Safety’ May Kill NYC Jobs, New York Post

1/28/09 Anti-CPSIA stories build as implementation deadline approaches, Consumer Reports.org – a supporter of CPSIA. The responses to this blog post are mostly excellent.

1/26/09 CPSIA Links, Overlawyered

1/25/09 New law banning toxins in toys threatens handmade craft businesses, The Grand Rapids Press – MLive.com

1/22/09 Scrap The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act–II, Forbes.com

1/22/09 Toy Story, Maui Weekly

1/18/09 Feb. 10: National Bankruptcy Day, Review Journal

1/16/09 Scrap the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, Forbes.com

1/15/09 Uncle Sam vs. your favorite toys, The Christian Science Monitor

1/15/09 Ten predictions for the CPSIA’s effect on children’s products in 2009, Z Recommends

1/15/09 The Very Latest on CPSIA and Books, Publishers Weekly

1/14/09 Pelosi’s Toy Story, The Wall Street Journal

1/13/09 All worry and no play, Santa Maria Sun

1/12/09 Using social tools to fight the CPSIA , Business Week

CPSIA Information Sources (many of these will link to more)

1/21/09 Letter from Committee on Energy and Commerce Members requesting a hearing before 2/10/09! (We are starting to get their attention – keep up the pressure, especially on Chairman Waxman.)

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (good luck with this one)

Fashion-Incubator

The Smart Mama

CSPIA –Central

National Bankruptcy Day

Reform CSPIA

Help Us Save Handmade, coolmompicks

Endangered Whimsy, a gallery of handmade products endangered by the CPSIA

Business is Personal

Mom 101

MomsRising.org

Check out the Class Action Lawsuit ]]> http://www.waytobow.com/2009/01/cpsia-information-articles-and-resources/feed/ 1 http://www.waytobow.com/2009/01/new-legislation-threatens-access-to-handmade-goods-for-kids/ http://www.waytobow.com/2009/01/new-legislation-threatens-access-to-handmade-goods-for-kids/#comments Sun, 04 Jan 2009 06:40:00 +0000 admin http://www.waytobow.com/archives/57 Did you know that handmade childrens products may soon be a thing of the past? New legislation goes into affect in February that threatens most small businesses and crafters making products for children. Foreign-made, mass produced toys have introduced a danger to our kids, exposing them to lead and other toxins, and I applaud the government’s effort to eliminate that threat. However, as currently written, the law known as CPSIA mandates expensive product testing by independent labs for each unique product offered, to verify safety. Small businesses that sell limited numbers of unique products simply can not afford thousands of dollars worth of testing per product, and it would be vastly more efficient to conduct testing on raw materials, rather than each finished product. Please contact your Congressional reps and let them know the law needs revisions to insure the livelihood of crafters and small businesses that supply our kids with the highest quality, unique, American-made products. Find out more about CPSIA, its impact on handmade goods, and actions you can take. See also CPSIA Central – Social Network. Most importantly, VOTE (below)!